Fiona Crawley vs Yexin Ma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Jun at 03:43 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Crawley vs Y. Ma

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crawley 1 - 0 Ma
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fiona Crawley winning 2 and Yexin Ma winning 0. The last match between Fiona Crawley and Yexin Ma was at the W35 Wichita, 20-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Fiona Crawley getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Crawley | 1 | 
| Ma | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Wichita(06-20-25)
F. Crawley vs Y. Ma H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $138,700 | Career Prize Money | $142,850 | 
| 67.48% (83-40) | Career Total W/L | 54.51% (290-242) | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 5 | Titles | 6 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) | 
F. Crawley vs Y. Ma Match Preview:
- How do Crawley and Ma compare in second serve performance? Crawley slightly edges out Ma, securing 37.57% of their second serve points compared to Ma's 37.12% in recent form.
 - Who's better at returning serves recently? Crawley has been more successful, winning 54.36% of opponent's second serve points, while Ma wins 48.72%. Crawley also triumphs in first serve returns, gaining 37.71% compared to Ma’s 31.69%.
 - Under pressure, how do they handle breakpoints? Ma saving 48.66% of breakpoints appears slightly more resilient than Crawley, who saves 45.67%.
 - In terms of last year’s overall performance, Crawley shows a superior win rate of 59.52%, against Ma’s 50.75%.
 - Evaluating surface preferences, Crawley excels on Hard courts with a 74% win rate, whereas Ma performs best on Clay with a 56% success ratio.
 - When analyzing competitive levels, Crawley has been performing in lower-tier tournaments with a 58.97% win rate, slightly more effective than Ma's 54.72% at similar events.
 - Regarding opponent quality, Ma has faced tougher competition over the past year, with opponents ranked on average at 345.43, while Crawley's opponents had an average rank of 432.5.
 - If the match reaches a deciding set, Crawley has a 47% success rate in such scenarios, compared to Ma’s 43%.
 - Break point conversion is critical, where Crawley shows a slight edge, converting 40.93% of opportunities compared to Ma’s 36.99%.
 
Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and statistics of both players, Crawley exhibits advantages in several key areas. Their second serve performance, return game prowess, and breakpoint conversion rates highlight stronger current form.
Crawley's preference for hard courts aligns well with potential surfaces, and their overall winning percentage in the past year further underscores their capability.
While Ma has faced higher-ranked opponents, which could indicate experience under pressure, Crawley's better success in deciding sets offers them a more favorable match outlook.
Considering these factors, Crawley emerges as the stronger contender and is most likely to win the upcoming match against Ma.
Fiona Crawley vs Yexin Ma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Crawley vs Y. Ma H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 6 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:20:46 | Average Match Time | 1:20:46 | 
| 86% (42/49) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) | 
| 62% (26/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) | 
| 43% (3/7) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) | 
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) | 
| 58% (28/48) | Return Points Win % | 41% (20/49) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
F. Crawley Recent Matches Played
Y. Ma Recent Matches Played

F. Crawley vs Y. Ma Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.48% (83/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.51% (290/242) | 
| 63.07% (181/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.99% (656/559) | 
| 55.39% (1439/1159) | Games Win/Loss | 52.34% (5766/5250) | 
| 71.43% (65/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.19% (220/186) | 
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.79% (40/33) | 
| 68.75% (11/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.97% (23/16) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (7/7) | 
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 | 
| 91 | Aces Total | 634 | 
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 | 
| 342 | Total Double Faults | 1607 | 
| 1:37:58 | Average Match Time | 1:26:43 | 
| 408.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.02 | 
| 66% (4798/7297) | 1st Serve % | 59% (17491/29798) | 
| 60% (2877/4798) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (10686/17491) | 
| 45% (1125/2499) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5664/12305) | 
| 51% (519/1019) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1976/4133) | 
| 49% (3586/7337) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14466/30674) | 
| 66.67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 42.11% (8/11) | 
| 66.33% (65/33) | Challenger W/L | 53.73% (173/149) | 
| 77.78% (14/4) | Futures W/L | 58.47% (107/76) | 
| 67% (83/123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (283/522) | 
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (50/97) | 
| 63% (26/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (78/161) | 
| 92% (76/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (302/254) | 
| 8% (76/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (302/47) | 
| 28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (230/35) |